Re: Why the bump up in class?
I just want some track where le Mopar stands a chance because HP means nothing.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
The 24 Hours of LeMons Forums → LeMons Tech → Why the bump up in class?
I just want some track where le Mopar stands a chance because HP means nothing.
I just want some track where le Mopar stands a chance because HP means nothing.
![]()
tSoG wrote:I just want some track where le Mopar stands a chance because HP means nothing.
when is that on the lemons schedule?!?!?!?!?!? sign me the hell up!!!
Im still trying to figure out why they want to move our monza to "B" after 6 races and thousands of dollars spent we actually finish a race and this is what we get yes we were reletively fast and running well for the first 2 hours but that was because the ONLY guy on the team with any real skill or experience was driving and after our 4th guy hit the guardrail and everybody collected a few black flags we were lucky to finish its going to be hard to get people to sign up again knowing we will at best, probably finish in the bottom of "B" class at the next one
If this sounds whiny so be it I just dont think its fair to let the metro win multiple times before they get bumped and all we do is FINISH ? opinions ?
Opinions... just race, have fun, screw winning, unless of course you win.
Im still trying to figure out why they want to move our monza to "B" after 6 races and thousands of dollars spent we actually finish a race and this is what we get yes we were reletively fast and running well for the first 2 hours but that was because the ONLY guy on the team with any real skill or experience was driving and after our 4th guy hit the guardrail and everybody collected a few black flags we were lucky to finish its going to be hard to get people to sign up again knowing we will at best, probably finish in the bottom of "B" class at the next one
If this sounds whiny so be it I just dont think its fair to let the metro win multiple times before they get bumped and all we do is FINISH ? opinions ?
I believe they classify by how fast your car is, not how reliable. You said yourself you were relatively fast for 2 hours
It does sound whiny.
If the ONLY way you can get drivers to sign up, as you say, is for the chance to win, you should reconsider your choice of car...and drivers.
I love seeing non-conformal vehicles out competing, that's why I race a Jeep. We won Class C three races into our career with a magic weekend of good luck, and were promptly bumped to Class B...where we've been struggling ever since. Any less fun racing against the big boys? Not really. If anything it's made us raise our game...and there's nothing more satisfying than passing cars that should be waaaaaay quicker.
-M
sounds like if i want to run c class i will have to quit screwing around and finish the turbo fuego.....................thanks for the input everyone
After doing almost everything right this weekend and still getting completely shellacked at Summit, I'm not 100% on the move up so much anymore. At least down at that track the competition is crazy.
We got moved to Class A with our 78 Chevy Malibu. Judge Phil didn't let us know this before the event sowe didn't have a residual to make the car faster.
He told us the bump up was because the car is kinda fast and since we won the Denver race, we should be in "A".
I thought the classifications were for the cars, not the teams.
How the HELL is a 78 Malibu an A car?
2 races ago it was a "C" class car at CMP. Last Race it was a "B" car at NJMP. We got bumped up twice in 1 year without winning, or finishing for that matter until this last race at Summit Point.
Rob
There is no thick rulebook with carefully categorized formulas to determine car class (and to offer loopholes for Smokey Yunick types to exploit). There is just Jay and/or me and/or a very small number of classing-qualified assistant judges eyeballing the cars and performing a quick juggling of factors (e.g., type of car, modifications, past performance, general hooptiness, compatibility of car with track layout, etc.). At Summit, it was just me doing the classing, and I made two mistakes: putting the Anti-EPA Cougar and Rust In the Wind Saab-engined 300ZX in Class B. Nobody is whining about the 300ZX now, because it suffered some sort of mechanical problem Sunday (after spending most of the weekend in the top 3) and dropped down a few places, but I feel just as bad about letting that obvious A car into B just because it has a super-cool/stupid engine swap that shouldn't work at all. I put the Cougar into B because it has scattered multiple engines all over the track at every previous race, the suspension looked crappy, and it never occurred to me that it was even possible for a team with drivers good enough to spend an entire weekend turning quick black-flag-free laps— as Anti-EPA Racing did— would be willing to race a Fox Ford. So, I do my best but I screwed up this time, sorry.
As for the Ghetto Motorsports Malibu, yeah, lap times show that it wasn't as quick at Summit as I had expected. This is one of those situations in which I'm dealing with one of the top half-dozen got-their-shit-together teams in the entire series, a team that's up there with Hong Norrth and Eyesore when it comes to going fast while avoiding black flags and doing all the little things that save you 30 seconds here and there in the pits. A team like that in a car that might have 400 horsepower this time, with a suspension that's kind of icky but nowhere near hooptie status… well, I don't want to take chances (I feel the same way when I see such a car with a team I've never seen before, because I assume that every new team in a B+/A- car is stacked top-to-bottom with F1 ringers hired by a billionaire team captain). I probably should have pulled the car out of the inspection line and gone over it more thoroughly when I had the time to do so, and I'll keep this in mind next time. I don't feel as bad about this classing decision as I do about the Cougar and the 300ZX, but I should have given the Ghetto guys a better hearing and will do so next time.
One more thing: this idea that I will give you a residual that lets you make the car faster only applies to cars that utterly dominated C or B (thus mandating a class promotion for the next race) but would be hopelessly uncompetitive in the next higher class without a few improvements. In fact, I've only done this with a half-dozen cars out of the many hundreds that have been bumped up in class, and only with cars that are just barely clinging to the bottom end of their new class.
Car classing is going to be a PITA for the people that have to do it, and I think they largely get it right.
Figuring out what class to put a fast car that is likely to blow up is hard, because when it doesn't blow up, it's fast (the cougar in B).
Hopefully there aren't people talking behind our backs about our car's classing... During BS it often appears as though we are usually asked what class we think we belong in - if not outright then we are at least presented with an spot in the conversation to interject that. As a team, we also discuss this before the race. We jumped from C to B with our previous car and again with this car after winning class C. We think our car is a legitimate class B car - non-turbo 4 cylinder but reliable. There are definitely faster class B cars than us out there, and final standings among these cars depends largely on penalties and break downs.
The Saab turbo powered Nissan 300 was closing fast on us for 2nd in class B at Capitol Offense. We think the timing would have worked out that we would have finished about 1/2 a lap ahead of them - we were 2 laps up with ~45 minutes left and them running around 5 seconds a lap faster than us. But, we broke at the end. The only was we were close to being able to hang on to 2nd in class was to have no black flags, minimal driver changes, and no mechanical failures (until the end).
There were a lot of really fast cars at Capitol Offense... I felt like I was getting passed even more often than usual at that race.
......
There were a lot of really fast cars at Capitol Offense... I felt like I was getting passed even more often than usual at that race.
Yep. One of my drivers even came over the radio swearing we must be down on power (on day 2) because some of the E30's were blowing by him. Having dealt with this car going on 5 years now, if that was the case it would explode shortly (trust me). I explained that if it was he would be pitting soon for a new engine, otherwise everyone else is just going faster we aren't going slower. 2 laps later he set our fastest lap of the weekend and came back with "yeah I guess so..."
Some fast cars indeed- I felt like a slug on the straights with our 305, automatic, Camaro. The transmission and engine worked together though to make the car last through the entire weekend- engine has no power, transmission shifts early.
Keeping Class C pure is my top priority when classing, because C is the most important class in LeMons. Cars that straddle the C/B line are the toughest calls by far.
I understand it is difficult to get all the classing straight.
It is difficult to really prep a car with the expectation of being in one class and you are sent to a faster class with no prior warning.
If we are in A class then we are bringing an 87 rx7 to race in A class. There is no point bringing something different like the malibu if it is an A or even B class anyway.
This car is pretty cool, but maybe not for us anymore.
See you guys at cmp.
We're definitely a team that has had a car bumped up based on class domination and not the quality of the car. We have won only on driver and car reliability with long shifts, trying to stay out of people's way and minimal black flags. We're usually in the bottom 10% for fastest lap times, but then we somehow usually get in the top 25% on final laps. Having won class C by more than 35 laps at the last race, we got bumped up. It wasn't because we were so good, the car is just too reliable to be in C anymore. (Having said that, we had to replace the exhaust due to a hole that developed at the end of Saturday venting exhaust into the cabin and burning the shift boot, and we had to remove the alternator, retap a hole and re-attach the alternator to hold the belt tight on Saturday evening... minor stuff... but we were lucky it didn't come to pass during the day on Saturday or we would have been in the paddock for at least an hour).
That grey Monza (I think it was a Monza?) was really fast though. It's fastest lap was similar to most A cars. Not sure why they are whining about getting bumped up. The drivers were just unreliable and the car underachieved. Phil saw this and bumped them to B. If that car is driven well and holds together it could easily win class B, and could be a top 5 car.
I was debating on whether to even say something on the forum, but the above complaints about getting bumped up are kind of ironic. I wasn't the guy in our Metro at the end of the race on Sunday, but our driver was needlessly harassed by the Monza. It was slowing down, and speeding up around the Metro and the driver was waving his hands trying to induce a spin, I guess. Our driver tried slowing down, but the Monza wouldn't leave him alone. Eventually our driver just came into the hot pits to get some space away from the lunatic. I let the judges know of the harassment in case something happened. Not sure why someone would do that. Certainly not the type of behavior I would expect out of 99% of the Lemons drivers I know. Funny thing, he came over to our driver at the awards ceremony trying to act all nice, and admitted it to him that he was harrassing him, and was surprised how well he handled the harassment. Now we'll have to deal with them in class B. Oh joy.
One more thing: this idea that I will give you a residual that lets you make the car faster only applies to cars that utterly dominated C or B (thus mandating a class promotion for the next race) but would be hopelessly uncompetitive in the next higher class without a few improvements. In fact, I've only done this with a half-dozen cars out of the many hundreds that have been bumped up in class, and only with cars that are just barely clinging to the bottom end of their new class.
The answer lies in Rule 1.5
1.5: Winners and Prizes: There are four classes: A, B, C, and Prototype. Cars whose mechanical layouts have been radically altered from stock (ie mid-engined Metros and tube-frame Model Ts) may be moved to the Prototype class. All other classes are assigned (aka, pulled from our butts) during tech inspection based on the judges' best guesses; post-assignment whining gets you kicked into the next faster Class The Class A-, Class B-, and Class C-winning teams each receive $500--usually in nickels. Recipient of the highest score in the Index of Effluency--as determined by a super-secret equation including vehicle age, general hooptieness, reliability of country of origin, unlikelihood of success, and the Organizers' whim--receives $501, plus a free entry in the team's next race.
Here's the deal as I see it. You aren't currying much favor by making the judges look like jackasses publically. You could just as easily have had an offline discussion with Phil over this matter and could have received an explanation. But now you've made your bed and you have to lie in it.
Face it flounder, you effed up and showed some speed.
FWIW - Owner of a A classified car that goes C car speed.
The answer lies in Rule 1.5
1.5: Winners and Prizes: There are four classes: A, B, C, and Prototype. Cars whose mechanical layouts have been radically altered from stock (ie mid-engined Metros and tube-frame Model Ts) may be moved to the Prototype class. All other classes are assigned (aka, pulled from our butts) during tech inspection based on the judges' best guesses; post-assignment whining gets you kicked into the next faster Class The Class A-, Class B-, and Class C-winning teams each receive $500--usually in nickels. Recipient of the highest score in the Index of Effluency--as determined by a super-secret equation including vehicle age, general hooptieness, reliability of country of origin, unlikelihood of success, and the Organizers' whim--receives $501, plus a free entry in the team's next race.
Here's the deal as I see it. You aren't currying much favor by making the judges look like jackasses publically. You could just as easily have had an offline discussion with Phil over this matter and could have received an explanation. But now you've made your bed and you have to lie in it.
Face it flounder, you effed up and showed some speed.
FWIW - Owner of a A classified car that goes C car speed.
I'm going to assume you are talking to me. How is a 1:54 fast lap with the Malibu "showing some speed"? that is 7 or 8 seconds off the pace.
The thing that I am upset about is classing a car partially based on how the team does with a totally different car.
All I am saying is that if we are going to be put in A class, we will bring a non-cheaty A class car.
This is a discussion involving something I am trying to get clarification on. The whining is not for the sake of whining. Apparently there is no formula (like his Honor mentioned). I will quit clogging up this thread with posts related to the general discussion of this thread.
Rob
P.S. which car in your sig is the car that is C fast?
Here's the deal as I see it. You aren't currying much favor by making the judges look like jackasses publically. You could just as easily have had an offline discussion with Phil over this matter and could have received an explanation. But now you've made your bed and you have to lie in it.
First of all, I started this post, and it wasn't to try to make any of the judges look like jack asses. I don't think anybody has a problem with the job they do, or the way they do it.
I'm also familiar with rule 1.5. This post wasn't a question about classification, it was a question wondering what the rationale was in bumping a sh*tbox into a higher class simply because they had a good day. I mean, if we're trying to encourage class C cars, then why keep throwing them into a higher class?
I'm chuckling over the 'purity of Class C' comment. Yeah, I understand it, and agree with the sentiment. Just sounds kind of funny, trying to maintain the 'purity' of the crappiest class of cars..
bs
P.S. which car in your sig is the car that is C fast?
The RX7. Last year; Reno 62nd fastest lap out of 72, ran the entire 24. Did some work on it for Arsefreeze and it was 47th quick but still 1.5 secs slower than our most recent C class winner. Did I ask them about it? Yep. In private. Did I get an explanation? Yep. Does it bother me that they keep sticking it in A? Not really. Is it concievable that taking a beef like this public will change the situation? Not so much.
I figured that was what you were going to say.
The "A" class car I am probably going to run is an 87 RX7.
I am just generally an idiot / asshat apparently.
I am failing at this whole thing the entire way around.
P.S. we never showed speed with the Malibu. Only the 1980 RX7 we race at the Denver race shows speed and it has maybe 90hp.
want to slum it up in the lower class? buy a crappier car.
I thought I did.
Regardless, I'm an ass. I was in a bad mood because I'm tired of working on this car.
I want to formally apologize to Judge Phil. I'm sorry. You have been nothing but good to us! I appreciate everything you do at the races and the suggestions you have offered.
To everyone else: sorry for clogging up the thread. Just read everything I wrote as meow meow meow MEOW. Meow!
Thanks for the kind words your honor. I will shut up and let you do your job. I'd be pissed if you showed up at my business and told me what you thought I did wrong.
I am sorry.
Rob R.
The 24 Hours of LeMons Forums → LeMons Tech → Why the bump up in class?