Topic: Matter of interpretation

I don't know, he never left the pavement, technically.  Would this be considered 4 off?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?ebc=ANyPxKp … 3yrxrcxTUc

Scuderia Regurgito  '75 Fiat 131, '93 e36
2010 Stafford: Winner, class ugly  2011 NJMP: Organizer's Choice and violently exploded gearbox
2011 Stafford: Most From the Least, 2012 NJMP: Shockingly issue free, 2012 Loudon: Rod thru block
2012 Hooptiefest: Multiple spun bearings, 2013 Monticello: Head gaskets, 2013 Loudon: More head gaskets, 2013 NJMP, 2013 Hooptiefest, 2014 NJMPx2 and Heroic Fix

Re: Matter of interpretation

Lost brakes? That's crazy!

Re: Matter of interpretation

IMSA line for sure.

(For those not getting the reference: for last year's TUSC/now-WTSC race at COTA, the series opted not to enforce the track limits to save themselves a ton of work and with COTA's miles of paved runoff, WELP. Ain't nobody stayin' in the painted-on lines.)

4 (edited by BoB 2016-07-15 12:37 PM)

Re: Matter of interpretation

I was there when someone tried to use that excuse. when they turned onto a not part of the track.  Still counted as 4 off and a much longer talk.

Racing 4 Nickels - 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera
2011 SHOWROOM-SCHLOCK SHOOTOUT  IOE Winner
2012 The Chubba Cheddar Enduro Class C winner
Facebook Page