WARNING!!!! This may be a personal record for long posts.
Serj wrote:In the history of Lemons, has there been anyone so good as to hide epic-level cheating to such a degree that they took the overall win instead of spending 4 hours in the penalty box, or the curse?
Deep within to bowels of our dubious L28 just beyond the flux capacitor lies ... a Quad rotor. That's why it's fast ... but still blows up.
I would not consider our motor a cheater, let alone an epic-cheater but it has been out twice and is likely to come out a third time. We did re-ring the 200k+ motor and replaced the bearings. Putting a bearing in wrong resulted in the second engine removal, oops.
Now we have low compression on a couple of cylinders most likely due to a blown head gasket. Depending on what we find, the whole motor may come out or just the head. Since the head gasket is probably screwed due to running hot, the rings may have gotten screwed too.
The head was never flat to begin with either. I don't have a machine shop and the one I use does not work for free but they will probably be shaving my head this time for $40. So I may need to spend up to $150 fixing the motor.
If I had a car with a small block Ford or Chevy, I'd call PAW for a cheap rebuild kit. That buys a lot of reliability. Without that, I still recommend opening up a motor, cleaning things up, Loctiting and re-gasketing the thing. Re-gasketing alone can help with the leaks which are becoming more frowned upon.
I think the stacked RX7 went through several tubes of RTV trying to stop the oil pan from leaking. I am not sure how successful they were but they kept getting black flagged for leaking. So there are becoming some limits on craptitude.
So where does a built motor get you?
MurileeMartin wrote:Smart cheaters (assuming they've already done the most important thing: stacked their team with top-notch drivers who don't get penalties) would build their engines for reliability, not additional power. Have we had contenders who sneaked high-zoot oil pumps, forged pistons, new rings/bearings, and other reliability-enhancing, invisible-to-judges stuff under the budget radar? Probably.
Serj wrote:As far as i can tell, that answer is a resounding "no". Mostly because the really bad cheaters wind up driving like asshats to get around people in the corners, so get lots of penalty time or the crusher. if they manage to dodge those it's usually because their hot-rodded motor blew up on them.
While our motor may seem impressive, many of our drivers have been less than impressive. We have had many penalties, a couple of clutches and transmissions too. As mentioned in the above quotes, good driving is a HUGE factor in winning!!!!
Reliability is your friend:
I have talked to John Condren, Chief Chump, personally about some parts on cars like clutches. His basic comment is they don't make you any faster so who cares. Everyone should care, I certainly do.
My car went through 2 clutches in the first 2 races, mostly due to the drivers. However, cheap hot clutches work about as well as cheat hot brakes, meaning they die.
A good clutch like Performance Friction or ACT would probably be a huge improvement in my car. They start around $300. Fortunately, the clutch in the car now has made it through the last two races and is a generic lifetime warranty clutch so I only had to buy it once during the first race.
A good clutch may not make you faster but it will probably buy you more laps and go undetected. I know we would have finished better in the first two races. Since it doesn't make you faster, who cares? Reliability is worth far more than speed, especially in Enduros. So everyone should care. A shiny water pump is worth more than a shiny turbo.
MurileeMartin wrote:Smart cheaters .....
To counter this, we're breaking out our next BS Inspection innovation: Lie-detector testing!
I don't know how affective a lie detector will be surrounded by racers. It will just go haywire and blow up faster then an SHO.
The comment about Jonny and Phil being corrupt judges and not providing a good model for Judging is kind of an insult.
Judge Jonny wrote:I just LOVE this, from ChumpCar:
"Understand first, this is our FIRST time doing all this. Absolute
first. I have never done a vehicle value appraisal before, and neither
had any of the other judges working that night. Also, we have ZERO
past models to go off of. Although many of you would point to it, The
24 Hours of Lemons does not have a system for vehicle value appraisal.
They have openly corrupt judges that hand out penalty laps based on
how much they like the racers, the car, and how much they've been
bribed. Their lap penalty valuations are radically innacurate, unfair,
and biased. AND THAT'S FINE. They admit and promote as much, and it it
part of that series. But, for our purposes, it serves as absolutely no
model at all; we had to figure this out all on our own, with no
guides." TroubleOnWheels
The Chump forum referenced the 2005 Mini at MSR as a blatant cheater. The reality is the car has to be destroyed and those guys are in some kind of salvage business. They probably already made money on the car and were within the $500 rule.
I watched their tech and BS inspection. While I think they missed the point on their choice of car and did not quite understand the tech stuff (Zip tie mounted kill switch and window net). They fully understood and probably took notes on Theme and Bribing. It did them no good and they got 1066 laps, if I recall correctly, which was more or less arbitrary. I don't think you can overcome a 10 lap penalty at this point.
If you followed the letter of the rules on salvage sales bringing down the car value, you could probably race a very new but wrecked car like the Mini, in Lemons and especially in Chump. You will get burned in Lemons BS but should pass Chumps tech.
This would be much easier if you could buy wrecked cars directly from the insurance companies. This is similarly advantageous to having a machine shop. That's where you get into less fact based assessments of BS and why Miatas or Minis get burned a lot in Lemons.
Realistically, there are lots of cheap Miatas and many have upgraded suspension stuff. Throw in the huge Spec Miata field in SCCA and NASA and there are lots of cheap upgrades. Miatas are a great platform and receive a lot of scrutiny due to the availability of upgraded parts. In Chump, I think Miatas will see more lenience.
I know of a Black Widow Miata owner looking forward to Chump and TMS.
So does the Lemons BS inspection provide a more level playing field than Chump's more fact based tech, it's hard to tell. Once Chump makes assessments due to "intent" or "spirit" of rules or any other subjective matter, you are now in BS Inspection land.
Penalizing cars like the Volvo based on the assumption of cheating because they have a machine shop is exactly what BS is all about. Since Jonny and Phil have a weakness for Volvos, they probably would have gotten away with it though. Chief Chump John felt all cars were 100% legit and all the Volvos machine work was free anyway. Whiners felt differently.
I gotta get back with my guys at the machine shop about sponsoring us. Free machine labor for advertising on our future Crap Can rocket could be huge. My head really only needs about $200-300 in machining to make it bad ass.
While I am involved with Doug @ Awesome Z, everything we did to my car could have been done in my garage and a lot of it was. Other than putting the flywheel on a brake lathe. I may be a bit more equipped than the next guy but there are plenty more equipped guys than I am. A compressor, MIG welder, parts washer and basting equipment can really go a long way when building a car. Cleaning, inspecting and re-lubing as many parts as you can seriously improves reliability.
Once you get into machining a motor, even if you have the equipment, I think you're over the line and should count it toward your budget.
If you can buy cars from insurance companies, I think that's cheating too. Cars should be bought in a public format.
I have lost track of my rambling so much, I hope this makes sense.
Troy
#35 LRE
1973 Datsun 240Z