The whole discussion about money came up when someone thought Hallett should put in a bridge or something to provide infield access which would attract events like Lemons and bring in lots of money for the track.
While I am sure tracks make money on additional services like concessions and camping fees, the bulk of their revenue on an event is probably through their rental rate which is a fixed cost.
If you rent out a track, they don't care how many cars you bring as long as they get paid and you're safe. Getting them to allow 120ish cars on the track at the same time that's a whole 'nother thing and it ain't normal.
We rented out MSR in June for a 1 day DE. They will tell you your max track capacity is around 32 cars. That's about 1/4 of the field for next weeks race.
FYI, I think we paid MSR about $8500 for rent, insurance and corner workers (it's been a while and I don't recall the exact amount).
I have no problem with the Lemons crew making money. Large events help offset the cost of new events which often times have low turnout.
MSR Houston has increased it's field from 80 to 100 to 120. No Problem was around a 50 car field. No Problem was a great event but probably did not bring in a whole lot of money. Hopefully larger events like MSR, Nelson and Thunderhill can offset the lower turnout events. They also help increase the number of events from 11 to 23.
To me, the biggest miracle of Lemons was convincing some insurance company to cover it in the first place. We are kind of breaking the mold of normal racing and having a blast doing it.
While our entry fees are higher than SCCA, we have more "potential" track time and you can get a license for $50 if you don't have one. A 6 driver team will be around $1200 but that's $200 each. A $400 entry fee to most SCCA races is for 1 driver to do a couple of Sprint races. The NASA enduro this Spring at TWS was about $700 for about 8 hours. Lemons fees are fine. I think the camping fee kinda blows but that's it.
Troy
#35 LRE
1973 Datsun 240Z