Topic: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Due to confusion over the use of the word "continuous" in describing certain parts of the cage, we've updated the 2010 rules to say this:

Each major load-bearing member must be formed from its own single, continuous tube.

Basically, we're trying to avoid welded-together sections in major stress-bearing parts of the cage. ALL of the following designs are legal front-hoop configurations; welding the bolted sections (where applicable) is highly recommended:

NOTE: These illustrations serve to illustrate different styles of front hoops. Other elements of the cage designs shown may not conform to the Lemons rules. http://www.24hoursoflemons.com/pricesandrules.aspx

Single-piece front hoop:
http://www.hoverd.org/Tim/Fury/images/roll_cage_design_01.gif

Left and Right bars:
http://speed-eng.com/store/images/Roll%20Cage.jpg

Halo loop:
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_library/images/cages/rollcagedrawing1.gif

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Thank you, Nick.

Jer / Schumacher Taxi Service
2010 Spring CMP I.O.E. winner
2010 Sebring overall winner
1996 Miata, 1991 BMW E30, 1987 coROLLa (retired), 1984 Citation (retired), 1993 Miata (retired)

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Thanks for the clarification.  Basically, the cage spec is about the same as SCCA/BMWCCA/NASA.  Sounds good to me.

http://www.ducttapemotorsports.com/
http://www.teamdfl.com
"I can see it now, a pile of nickels and all the glory of being a real race car driver."
Prepping the Red wReck for the 24 Hours of Lemons

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

thank you. that eases my worries



VoR

No Budget Racing
Chief Instigator
1991 Ponticrap OnFirebird
Racing a Camaro/Firebird at Lemons is a box full of fail, thats why we do it.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

TeamDFL wrote:

Thanks for the clarification.  Basically, the cage spec is about the same as SCCA/BMWCCA/NASA.  Sounds good to me.

Which begs the question ... why don't the Lemons cage rules just refer to another sanctioning body's ruleset?

To finish first, first you must finish. -Rick Mears
Pandamonium Racing

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Just to add since this is a sticky post and since the question has come up several times already, the Autopower bolt in cage is legal WITH THE ADDITION OF A SECOND DOOR BAR per Nick here:

http://forums.24hoursoflemons.com/viewt … 2338#p2338

The Homer: Powerful like a gorilla, yet soft and yielding like a Nerf ball.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

LTDScott wrote:

Just to add since this is a sticky post and since the question has come up several times already, the Autopower bolt in cage is legal WITH THE ADDITION OF A SECOND DOOR BAR per Nick here:

http://forums.24hoursoflemons.com/viewt … 2338#p2338

Thanks, Scott, that's correct.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Nick_LeMonsHQ wrote:

Thanks, Scott, that's correct.

Thanks for quickly and accurately replying to all of us and addressing our concerns. You put a lot of worried minds at ease!

The Homer: Powerful like a gorilla, yet soft and yielding like a Nerf ball.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Nick_LeMonsHQ wrote:

Due to confusion over the use of the word "continuous" in describing certain parts of the cage, we've updated the rules to say this:

Each major load-bearing member must be formed from its own single, continuous tube.

Basically, we're trying to avoid welded-together sections in major stress-bearing parts of the cage. ALL of the following designs are legal; welding the bolted sections (where applicable) is highly recommended:

I appreciate the clarification that the pictures provide, and maybe it's just me, but I don't see how the second two meet the description above...  Our cage was made with continuous left and right bars so I'm glad to see that shown however.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

TeamDFL wrote:

Thanks for the clarification.  Basically, the cage spec is about the same as SCCA/BMWCCA/NASA.  Sounds good to me.

The one real difference I know between Lemons and SCCa or NASA cages is the DOM requirement.  Lemons allows ERW but encourages DOM. 

Something to consider is that the standards keep going up so DOM may become required before to long.

The bottom picture looks like our Jegster cage whcih is NHRA approved but uses ERW not DOM.  the middle pic lookslke and Autopower which should use DOM tubing.

It also sounds like the tubes will have to be mandrel bent.  Not for sure though.

Troy

#35 LRE
1973 Datsun 240Z

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Troy wrote:

It also sounds like the tubes will have to be mandrel bent.  Not for sure though.

It is impossible to mandrel bend a continuous piece of tubing, such as that used in cages.  An unacceptable bend is one that deforms the inner radius in such a way that the tubing 'crushes', such as you'll often see in cheap muffler bends at the auto parts stores.

It is also unacceptable to use a 'stretch bender' that maintains the same diameter of the tubing but in doing so stretches the metal, thins it out and makes it weaker.

An acceptable bender will have follower dies to maintain the tubing shape without crushing or stretching.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

True, a good bender will have follower dies and a no-shit main die strong enough to prevent crushing or wrinkling. I have a Pro 105 mandrel bender, it does a real good job. Smooth bends, no wrinkling or crushing. #1 thing to look for: steel dies. Aluminum dies can and will spread, leaving you with an unacceptable bend.

No affiliation other than buying a bender.

http://www.pro-tools.com/105.htm

Philosophy of life: old age and treachery will ALWAYS overcome youth, enthusiasm and cash. General smartass know it all beer swilling ne'er do well. Avoid eye contact with this person, best avoided completely. 2008 Animal House Racing CMP 'Most Likely To Leave In An Ambulance' 2009 Blind Rodent Racing CMP 2010 Team Galileo CMP 2011 Roundhouse Kick Racing CMP 2012 Road Kill Grill Racing CMP (x2)

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Junkyard Dog wrote:

True, a good bender will have follower dies and a no-shit main die strong enough to prevent crushing or wrinkling. I have a Pro 105 mandrel bender, it does a real good job. Smooth bends, no wrinkling or crushing. #1 thing to look for: steel dies. Aluminum dies can and will spread, leaving you with an unacceptable bend.

No affiliation other than buying a bender.

http://www.pro-tools.com/105.htm

Dude, I hate to be the one to tell you... that's not a mandrel bender.  Mandrel benders are defined by having inner dies and gigantic hydraulics and are usually computer controlled in my experience.  It may be possible to use an inner mandrel die with a manual bender, but I don't know how.

http://www.vansantent.com/definitions.htm

That is a very good rotary draw bender.

Having said all that cocky stuff, I'm no expert and had to do some research to make sure what I was saying was correct.  If anyone has different information and can back it up I'd love to learn more about tube bending.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Okey doke, I screwed up the description: the 105 is actually a 'manual draw bender' and not a 'mandrel bender'. It will still make SCCA etc legal and safe bends and I stand by the 'no aluminum dies' statement.

Philosophy of life: old age and treachery will ALWAYS overcome youth, enthusiasm and cash. General smartass know it all beer swilling ne'er do well. Avoid eye contact with this person, best avoided completely. 2008 Animal House Racing CMP 'Most Likely To Leave In An Ambulance' 2009 Blind Rodent Racing CMP 2010 Team Galileo CMP 2011 Roundhouse Kick Racing CMP 2012 Road Kill Grill Racing CMP (x2)

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Question RE the last picture with the Halo hoop:

Actually I dont have a question on the halo hoop but on the rear hoop/harness bar section.  Do any additional bars need to be added to that rear section where the harness bar is (aside obviously from the diagonals from the top of the roll hoop to the back of the car).

Tom Lomino - Proud to be a 23x Lemons Loser, 3x Class B, and 1x IOE Winner!
Craptain, Team Farfrumwinnin - 1995 Volkswagen Golf #14
Click here to "Like" us on Facebook   Click here for our Youtube Videos
Lifetime Achievement (of hopelessness) Award Winners

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

DOM is not mandatory, it's just "very strongly recommended" under the New and Re-Revised Rules:

3.1.1: Rollbar Tubing and Padding: Minimum tubing size for cars weighing under 3000 pounds as raced is 1.50" x .120" or 1.75" x .095". Cars weighing over 3000 pounds as raced must use a minimum tubing size of 1.75" x .120". Properly-bent, racecar-grade and -quality tubing is mandatory: no stretched or crushed bends allowed. DOM mild steel is very strongly recommended over ERW (seamed) tubing.

Unless you are saying that ERW is not made in 1.5x.120 or 1.75x.095, in which case DOM would be your only choice.

Pat Mulry, TARP Racing #67

Mandatory disclaimer: all opinions expressed are mine alone & not those of 24HOL, its mgmt, sponsors, etc.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

My understanding of the rules is that there need to be a one piece continuous diagnal but does not require any other cross bracing.  Of course to do it right, you should have a horizontal harness bar (shown in that picture)  that attaches from the diagnal to the main hoop and that should be carried over to the passenger side of the car for strength. 

http://schumachertaxiservice.com/corwebpics/images/v20080120.jpg

--Rob Leone Schumacher Taxi Service
We won the IOE at Southern Discomfort.
We got screwed at The Real Hoopties of New Jersey  and we took cars down with us.
We got the curse at Capitol Offense but they wouldn't let us destroy the car.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

RobL wrote:

My understanding of the rules is that there need to be a one piece continuous diagnal but does not require any other cross bracing.  Of course to do it right, you should have a horizontal harness bar (shown in that picture)  that attaches from the diagnal to the main hoop and that should be carried over to the passenger side of the car for strength. 

http://schumachertaxiservice.com/corweb … 080120.jpg

See we have a horizontal bar plus two downward diagonal braces from the ends of the harness bar, as per the 3rd photo in the original post, I am trying to see if we need that continuous diagonal to be added as well.  It wouldnt really add well with the way the cage is set up.

Tom Lomino - Proud to be a 23x Lemons Loser, 3x Class B, and 1x IOE Winner!
Craptain, Team Farfrumwinnin - 1995 Volkswagen Golf #14
Click here to "Like" us on Facebook   Click here for our Youtube Videos
Lifetime Achievement (of hopelessness) Award Winners

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

As per my reading of the rules, you would need a continuous diagnal.  You could post up pics of what you have and see if you could get Nick to comment.

--Rob Leone Schumacher Taxi Service
We won the IOE at Southern Discomfort.
We got screwed at The Real Hoopties of New Jersey  and we took cars down with us.
We got the curse at Capitol Offense but they wouldn't let us destroy the car.

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

RobL wrote:

As per my reading of the rules, you would need a continuous diagnal.  You could post up pics of what you have and see if you could get Nick to comment.

What we have is exactly whats in the "halo Hoop"photo in Nick's post.  The only other thing our cage has is 2 diagonals this is it:

http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e302/tommy861/CAGEnewHC.jpg

Tom Lomino - Proud to be a 23x Lemons Loser, 3x Class B, and 1x IOE Winner!
Craptain, Team Farfrumwinnin - 1995 Volkswagen Golf #14
Click here to "Like" us on Facebook   Click here for our Youtube Videos
Lifetime Achievement (of hopelessness) Award Winners

21 (edited by davebs14 2009-06-08 12:21 PM)

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Would any of these be acceptable?

#1
http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p181/miata_racer/RollCage2.jpg


#2
http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p181/miata_racer/RollCage3.jpg

#3
http://i128.photobucket.com/albums/p181/miata_racer/RollCage4.jpg

David Hedderick
Houston, TX
1986 325ese Shitbox Lemons car (sold...blowed up)
1990 miata drift car...like the BMW only slower and with a twisted chassis :\

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

@David: The 'X' is explicitly allowed, not sure about the others.

I agree that this is most likely just a document revision problem, expecting 'real' document control is probably not realistic given the many demands on the organizers' time. I'm sure this'll all be cleared up shortly.

2x Volvo PV544 (RIP '63) B20 power!
2007/2012/2013 Driver's Championship (what was I thinking!?) 144 races and counting.
2/25/24

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

I hope so...I just need to see how to modify our cage.

David Hedderick
Houston, TX
1986 325ese Shitbox Lemons car (sold...blowed up)
1990 miata drift car...like the BMW only slower and with a twisted chassis :\

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

davebs--all three of your proposed door bar designs are acceptable.

X-args--You're absolutely right, the V4 version of the techsheet is the product of a "Document Revision Error" or DRE. Please call tech support in Djibouti.

No, really, we totally screwed the pooch on that one. DOM tubing is NOT mandatory (though recommended). ERW seamed tubing is acceptable. X-args gets bonus points for reading the tech sheet (something we obviously didn't do)--it will be revised shortly.

To avoid confusion for future forum searchers, I'm going to delete the posts that show the DOM requirement (oh, who am I kidding, I'm just covering our tracks so I can lie about it down the road.)

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Nick_LeMonsHQ wrote:

davebs--all three of your proposed door bar designs are acceptable.

X-args--You're absolutely right, the V4 version of the techsheet is the product of a "Document Revision Error" or DRE. Please call tech support in Djibouti.

No, really, we totally screwed the pooch on that one. DOM tubing is NOT mandatory (though recommended). ERW seamed tubing is acceptable. X-args gets bonus points for reading the tech sheet (something we obviously didn't do)--it will be revised shortly.

To avoid confusion for future forum searchers, I'm going to delete the posts that show the DOM requirement (oh, who am I kidding, I'm just covering our tracks so I can lie about it down the road.)

Nickcan you advise us on our cage design, the photo is a couple posts up.  Is that ok or do we need a diagonal bar through the harness bar....

Tom Lomino - Proud to be a 23x Lemons Loser, 3x Class B, and 1x IOE Winner!
Craptain, Team Farfrumwinnin - 1995 Volkswagen Golf #14
Click here to "Like" us on Facebook   Click here for our Youtube Videos
Lifetime Achievement (of hopelessness) Award Winners