Riktor wrote:Speedycop wrote:My personal opinion is that the winning car of any given race should be given a "winner's penalty" in the next race equal to the number of laps they won by. If a given car was far ahead of the pack, that would equalize things a bit for the rest of the field, preventing a super dominant car from repeating again and again.
WOAH WOAH WOAH... you're suggesting Lemons cars are consistant from race to race...
Point proven...
Eyesore is consistantly fast and reliable, right? Don't they have two overall wins? Kudos to them, they totally deserve it. My point and my opinion was only that one car should not dominate. If a given car spanks the field by a huge margin, they should have an equal penalty upon their return. If a dominant car were to sandbag, of course they run the risk of that backfiring in a big way (black flag/flat tire, etc.). Seems that the winners don't take any issue with this, and although I had no idea, it seems the judges feel similarly. No point is proven, any car can fail at any time. That doesn't mean you ignore a dominant car because it might break.
Captain: Speedycop & The Gang Of Outlaws -'94 Mark VIII (Least Horrible Yank Tank Stafford '09, NOLA '10) '61 Caddy (Org Choice-NL '09) '63 Tbird (EPIC Repair Failure-Gingerman '10, I Got Screwed-Summit Pt '10, I.O.E. WINNER Stafford '10!) '77 Lancia Scorpion (I.O.E. WINNER Joliet 2010!) '67 Galaxie 500 (Judges Choice-CMP '11)
Future Fleet: 1957 Ford Prefect 1942 Buick 1959 Bugeye Project GLCOAT