ifb_mole wrote:The longest straight was 4th gear, about 5,800 RPM, 118 MPH.
The straight line speed I think is fine, it's the braking and cornering that is the shortfall
You're thinking like a drag racer, and this isn't drag racing. You are also "fine" with the straight line speed. But that straight line speed is a function of a couple things.
Drag vs Horse power. For a given Horse power (at peak), your car will only go so fast based on its drag (with gearing to have the maximum HP at the peak RPM). to go faster you need more Hp.
But how fast you get to top speed is acceleration. Your car will accelerate fast with lower gearing, or less weight, or more Hp. To do that you have to 1. shift to a lower gear and run up to redline, 2. change out your rear end to get a lower drive ratio, or 3. bigger engine, 4. use smaller tires. (one of those is easy to do, but hard on the car, another is easy and helps in other ways, and the third/fourth is expensive). If you have 5 gears to use and they are lower, you can optimize your engine speed to use max power in every place on the track. Why do you think bicycles have gone from 1 to 3 to 5 to 8 to 12 to 18, to 30 speed gearing???? to maximize the limited Hp of the human body!.
ifb_mole wrote:so you think a narrower (less than the 245 / 255 width the car has now) on smaller (15" / 16") tire/wheel combo, that is even lighter than now, will help the car corner/brake better, primarily because of the wieght? Hummm...I gotta discuss this with Chris, you just may be on to something here, so thanks.
Having a big grippy tire in the corners is awesome, but this is about compromise of cornering speed vs acceleration, braking and straight line speed. And at some point you'll have more tire than you need. I'll bet you won't loose that much cornering speed with a 225/40, vs a 255/40. But you'll gain in other areas.
Weight, there is a rough rule of thumb that says 1 lbs of wheel weight is worth 2x lbs of body weight.
The real thing to understand is not so much the weight, but the inertia of the wheel. Interia, or the moment of Inertia (see wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia ) for a wheel like element is I= mr^2 (that's mass * radius squared). So the further the mass is away from the axle of the wheel, the more it increases the inertia.
lets assume that all of the 59 lbs of the 17" (diameter) tire/wheel is in the tread (which is not, so this is overly stated). The sidewall height is 255*40% (255mm*0.40=102 mm or 4") so the radius is 17/2 + 4 = 12.5". Square that = 156.25 in2, times 59 lbs = 9219 lbsinch2 (pounds inch squared).
The 20 lbs 225/40/15" tire plus 15 lbs rim =35 lbs. same calculations = 4235 lbsin2. So there is less stored energy each wheel (that was only one wheel calculation). Now that's not as big a deal as car weight, but it can make a difference.
ifb_mole wrote:As for the springs you mentioned, the Maxima is a McPhearson strut in front and you say the 4runner REAR spring will fit in a Maxima McPhearson strut??
Yes, look at the spring perch for the front Maxima, if its the same as the late 200sx its a 6" dia spring, kind of big. The 4 Runner rear is a 6" spring also. and there are some other springs that will fit that also., just have to take a tape measure to the JY.
Dudes Ex Machina:
https://www.facebook.com/dudesexmachina?Everyone who has ever built anywhere a 'new heaven' first found the power thereto in his own hell- Frederick Nietzsche