Topic: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

So I want to race a DSM engine. This seems like a terrible idea, as the early 90s talon/lancer/eclipse seem to be pretty darn unreliable. My question is twofold: Is this just a waste of time? If its just stupid idea but has a chance of success, any suggestions as to what I can do to make it last longer?

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Brilliant idea.  No, really.  smile

Jer / Schumacher Taxi Service
2010 Spring CMP I.O.E. winner
2010 Sebring overall winner
1996 Miata, 1991 BMW E30, 1987 coROLLa (retired), 1984 Citation (retired), 1993 Miata (retired)

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Its never a waste of time. Its a) Lemons, b) educational, c) entertaining.

Dudes Ex Machina: https://www.facebook.com/dudesexmachina

?Everyone who has ever built anywhere a 'new heaven' first found the power thereto in his own hell- Frederick Nietzsche

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Ok good. On to the more important question of trying to make it semi reliable and/or not as unreliable as if I do nothing. I will do the balance shaft removal, I also seem to remember these cars having horrible electrical problems so lots of zip ties will be employed. Any other suggestions?

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

I could be wrong, but wouldn't leaving the balance shaft in place make the engine run smoother and thus potentially be more reliable?  Removing the balance shaft is a PERFORMANCE mod.

Lemons South 2008 - Fail, Lemons South Spring 2009 - Fail, Lemons Detroit(ish) 2008 - Fail, Lemons South Fall 2009 - Fail, Lamest Day 2009 - Fail, Miami 2010 (Chump) - 2nd!, Sebring 2010 (Chump) - Fail, Cuba 2010 - Crew Chief, Roebling 2011 (Chump) - 8th!, Sebring 2011(Chump) - 19th!

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Bring a spare set of head gaskets, and beef up your cooling system.

Team Final Gear Crew Chief
#138 1997 Pontiac GTP - Supercharged 3800
#42   1999 Ford P71 Crown Vic

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

I could be wrong but as I understand balance shafts, they just spin really fast to counteract the fact that the descending and ascending pistons are not completely opposed to one another. I thought the negative to removal was that the car would shake more, but the positive was basically less moving parts in an engine to lubricate, removal of a belt that if it dies takes the timing belt with it, and I think there are some bearings i don't want thrown into the engine. Then again, my lack of knowledge is why I'm here in the first place, so please correct me!

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

If you don't know what you're doing or exactly what will happen with the engine if you remove the balance shaft, then it's best just to leave it as is.  The possible reward isn't worth the risk, especially when you're doing an endurance race.

Team Final Gear Crew Chief
#138 1997 Pontiac GTP - Supercharged 3800
#42   1999 Ford P71 Crown Vic

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Boris wrote:

So I want to race a DSM engine. This seems like a terrible idea, as the early 90s talon/lancer/eclipse seem to be pretty darn unreliable. My question is twofold: Is this just a waste of time? If its just stupid idea but has a chance of success, any suggestions as to what I can do to make it last longer?

No waste of time at all, just make sure not to overheat the engine and run a bit heavier oil in it. We just finished the PBIR race in a 1991 Eagle Talon TSi and finished the race in 11th. Only thing is these cars tend to push a bit.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Mitsus get a bad rap because they're so cheap, inexperienced mechanics get them and try to break land speed records and it doesn't end well.

A beefy cooling system, a little extra torque on the head bolts, and lots of luck should get you there. The main reason to delete the balance shafts is to remove the belt that drives them. If that belt breaks, it can get into the timing belt, and since it's an interference engine the valves get bent. Look into getting the oil cooler off of a 1990 car too, it's air/oil instead of the janky water/oil cooler the later ones used.

Check out vfaq.com, it has most of the maintenance stuff you'll want on there.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

If you want to get really LeMony, the turbo DSM motors will swap into a Hyundai. We actually considered this before we found our Jag. One of our team members has a beater AWD turbo DSM that he abuses for fun, but the Hyundai owner wanted far too much for a seriously funky POS.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Let me fix that for you.



CarRacer wrote:

Mitsus get a bad rap because...

...they are worthless piles of pot metal parts designed by war criminals, butchered by accountants, and cast from recycled Stromburg carbs and V-2 rockets.

http://www.ducttapemotorsports.com/
http://www.teamdfl.com
"I can see it now, a pile of nickels and all the glory of being a real race car driver."
Prepping the Red wReck for the 24 Hours of Lemons

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

TeamDFL wrote:

Let me fix that for you.



CarRacer wrote:

Mitsus get a bad rap because...

...they are worthless piles of pot metal parts designed by war criminals, butchered by accountants, and cast from recycled Stromburg carbs and V-2 rockets.

So what's the problem with them then?

I am mentally divergent in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life there. When I stop coming here, I will be well...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

CarRacer wrote:

The main reason to delete the balance shafts is to remove the belt that drives them. If that belt breaks, it can get into the timing belt, and since it's an interference engine the valves get bent.

You might want to remove the drive belt, but actually leave the balance shaft in place.
If you remove the balance shaft, the oil feeds to the shaft bearings will be wide open and will leak a lot of oil. That might drop your engine oil pressure (like having a huge leak). So leaving the balance shaft in place will keep those oil holes filled up and keep the oil pressure in a normal range. Since it just rotates in place, and doesn't interact with anything else, this should work fine.

The problem seems to be the drive belt, so remove that.

Dudes Ex Machina: https://www.facebook.com/dudesexmachina

?Everyone who has ever built anywhere a 'new heaven' first found the power thereto in his own hell- Frederick Nietzsche

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

If it's really a belt, you should be able to cut it off, without disturbing the cam belt.

Silent But Deadly Racing-  Ricky Bobby's Laughing Clown Malt Liquor Thunderbird , Datsun 510, 87 Mustang (The Race Team Formerly Known as Prince), 72 Pinto Squire waggy, Parnelli Jones 67 Galaxie, Turbo Coupe Surf wagon.(The Surfin Bird), Squatting Dogs In Tracksuits,  Space Pants!  Roy Fuckin Kent and The tribute to a tribute to a tribute THUNDERBIRD/ SUNDAHBADOH!

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

You could just put a new belt on so there is little to no risk of it breaking during the race.

Team Final Gear Crew Chief
#138 1997 Pontiac GTP - Supercharged 3800
#42   1999 Ford P71 Crown Vic

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

PunisherBass wrote:

You could just put a new belt on so there is little to no risk of it breaking during the race.

This.

I think the typical DSM failure is more of the main bearing and head gasket variety.  If you want to finish the race, put in new bearings, a new oil pump, new head gasket (properly torqued, run-in, and re-torqued) new belts and hoses all around, a good radiator and an oil cooler.

Or... just practice your engine swap technique and bring several spares.

Lemons South 2008 - Fail, Lemons South Spring 2009 - Fail, Lemons Detroit(ish) 2008 - Fail, Lemons South Fall 2009 - Fail, Lamest Day 2009 - Fail, Miami 2010 (Chump) - 2nd!, Sebring 2010 (Chump) - Fail, Cuba 2010 - Crew Chief, Roebling 2011 (Chump) - 8th!, Sebring 2011(Chump) - 19th!

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Is that what the track geeks were running last year? you might talk to them they were parked next to us in the garage with a blown motor or head gasket at CMP's fall race

2010, 26th @ CMP, 2011, 10th & 5th at CMP, 2012? (MIA), 2013 Spring CMP, 53rd, 2013 Fall CMP 44th, 2014 Barber 14th, 2014 CMP 46th, 2015 CMP 57th, 2015 CMP 80th, 2016 CMP 16th, 3rd in B class, Winner Judges choice, and First car under 2.0 liter Alex's lemon aide stand winner. 2017 WRL, Road Atlanta 43rd, 2017 NCM 9th O/A , 1st in B class, 2018 CMP 13th O/A 3rd in Class B

19 (edited by SoFlacrapcan 2011-01-12 03:31 PM)

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Ive had 3 talon tsi awd's and all of them spit out balance shaft bearings. To remove them you need to take out the balance shafts theres 2 of them, the front is belt driven, the rear is driven off the back of the oil pump. On front, remove the shaft and put in new shaft bearings, but don't line up the oil passages, off set it so the bearing blocks off the oil passages, then plug the whole in the front of the block. On back cut the balance shaft off the back of the oil pump assembly so theres only a stub left, and do the same thing with offseting the bearings.

Do not run with only one balance shaft, they are both there to offset eachother. With only one it will shake worse then having none at all.

Aftermarket places sell kits like these for around $40, but it can be done for much less, under 10 bucks if you can source the parts yourself
http://www.cimotorsports.net/motor-spor … -4g63.html

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

I actually have a 96 talon tsi awd, with a 6 bolt 4g63, so I have a little experience with the Mitsu engine.  I say for sure ditch the balance shafts.  If done properly, it should improve the overall reliability of the engine.  It's not so much a performance mod as it is a reliability thing.  The way I understand it, these shafts spin at twice the engine RPM, so I can imagine, lubrication is pretty crucial to these.  All the balance shafts do is to mask a vibration that is inherent to the motor by adding a canceling secondary vibration, if that makes any sense.  Just an unnecessary part that can fail.  Remove it.   These engines need all the help they can get in the reliability department.  Also, they can handle quite a bit of boost, but I wouldn't recommend that for an endurance race. If you go turbo, stick with small boost.

Also, speaking from experience, on the turbo motor, there is an oil cooler attached to the block that the oil filter fits onto.  When removing that filter, it's easy to loosen the oil cooler from the block.  I dropped all of my new engine oil out merging onto I-35 that way once.  Quite a spectacle.   I'm sure no one is as stupid as me, but just some advice from a dumbass:  Make sure the nut holding the oil cooler is tight before replacing the oil filter.

I am mentally divergent in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life there. When I stop coming here, I will be well...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

So my semi increased reliability checklist (I'm sure something else will break regardless) thus far is:

Beefy cooling system (Giant jy radiator smashed in)
Balance shafts removed
New Head Gasket torqued, broken in, re-torqued
New Oil Pump
New Bearings
New belts all around
New oil cooler
I think the turbo runs around 11 psi stock. I will turn it down to around 8.

Please add to the list! Also feel free to subtract, I really appreciate all the input.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Oil pump may be more than you want to spend. If you're replacing that, it's a good idea to replace the front case. They wear in together. You're better off just checking the end play of the gears with a feeler gauge and making sure it's within spec.

Do everything you can to protect the alternator from heat. Their placement is right next to the downpipe. The exhaust manifolds are known to crack, the 2nd generation exhaust mani is a good upgrade on the cheap.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

SoFlacrapcan wrote:

Ive had 3 talon tsi awd's and all of them spit out balance shaft bearings. To remove them you need to take out the balance shafts theres 2 of them, the front is belt driven, the rear is driven off the back of the oil pump. On front, remove the shaft and put in new shaft bearings, but don't line up the oil passages, off set it so the bearing blocks off the oil passages, then plug the whole in the front of the block. On back cut the balance shaft off the back of the oil pump assembly so theres only a stub left, and do the same thing with offseting the bearings.

Do not run with only one balance shaft, they are both there to offset eachother. With only one it will shake worse then having none at all.

Aftermarket places sell kits like these for around $40, but it can be done for much less, under 10 bucks if you can source the parts yourself
http://www.cimotorsports.net/motor-spor … -4g63.html

I had the kit that came with bearings sans the oil passages.  I have heard that on the cheap, you can flip thestock  bearings around so that there is no chance of the oil passages lining up.  Havn't actually done that myself, but that's something I would look into if Lemonizing a 4g63.

Also, in case you didn't know, to be safe, stay away from the later "7 bolt" motors, & atick with the earlier "6 bolt" ones.  I don't know how much it's been blown out of proportion in the internet, but I wouldn't want to chance the dreaded crank-walk!

I am mentally divergent in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life there. When I stop coming here, I will be well...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

EricTheBrown wrote:

I don't know how much it's been blown out of proportion in the internet, but I wouldn't want to chance the dreaded crank-walk!

nah, i don't think the internets have picked up on it

http://lh6.ggpht.com/Evaristo.Jo/SMarDNC_YoI/AAAAAAAAALs/s5srq9OVpyw/crankwalk.jpg

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

eljefe17 wrote:
EricTheBrown wrote:

I don't know how much it's been blown out of proportion in the internet, but I wouldn't want to chance the dreaded crank-walk!

nah, i don't think the internets have picked up on it

http://lh6.ggpht.com/Evaristo.Jo/SMarDN … nkwalk.jpg

Ha Ha!  I had a feeling the internet would never exaggerate!    Crank walk is real!

I am mentally divergent in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life there. When I stop coming here, I will be well...