Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

I guess it's been too long since I caged a full frame car....I recall my '74 Parisienne had plenty of meat in the frame...

Jim "Endo" Anderton
30 years of racing and still not Brambilla.....

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Our builder did not notch the frame to weld it in he actually used a holesaw and bent the tube to drop through the holes in the frame, then he welded the tubing to the top and bottom portion of the frame so it had 2 nice solid points of attachment. Just remember that when you are closing up the gaps to leave a space for the tech inspectors to verify the welds are 360Degrees around the tubing. This was done on a 97 crown vic at 6 points where the cage attached to the frame. Pics here http://pantingpolarbearracing.com/techstuff.html there is a pic of the weld to the frame.

'13  Sonoma - Class B Crown Vic, 14 Sonoma IOE - Race Rambler!, Autobahn Class C+IOE #Racevan!, '15 Thill IOE Winner - Omega!, '16 Ridge - IOE - Avanti!, '17 THill Class C Winner - Omega, Butt IOE - Race 411, Sonoma IOE - Aztek '18 Butt - IOE - Allante, MSR - IOE - '41 Olds - '19 Butt-Class C - Allante, '20 Covid, '21 THill-Class B - Omega, Sonoma - IOE and HWG  - Satellite, '22 Sonoma - HWG-Tojan

103

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Finally, you must have one main-hoop diagonal support--the simplest way to accomplish this is to run a clean, straight tube from the driver's-side top corner of the main hoop to the passenger's side bottom cage-mounting pad at a more-or-less 45-degree angle. This bar will likely intersect your harness bar; you can make either the diagonal or the harness bar from two pieces to deal with that intersection, but the finished two-piece section must still form a very straight, very clean line.


I pulled this from the Lemons website under rules, my question is my 2 piece diagonal bar legal? from the sounds of this discussion it wouldn't be. please let me know thanks Steve

2010, 26th @ CMP, 2011, 10th & 5th at CMP, 2012? (MIA), 2013 Spring CMP, 53rd, 2013 Fall CMP 44th, 2014 Barber 14th, 2014 CMP 46th, 2015 CMP 57th, 2015 CMP 80th, 2016 CMP 16th, 3rd in B class, Winner Judges choice, and First car under 2.0 liter Alex's lemon aide stand winner. 2017 WRL, Road Atlanta 43rd, 2017 NCM 9th O/A , 1st in B class, 2018 CMP 13th O/A 3rd in Class B

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

steve wrote:

. This bar will likely intersect your harness bar; you can make either the diagonal or the harness bar from two pieces to deal with that intersection, but the finished two-piece section must still form a very straight, very clean line.


Steve

Sounds pretty cut and dry to me. Unless your diagonal bar is all out of line you should be fine with a two piece.

All great moments start with the phrase "hey man, hold my beer"
http://dumbshitswithabeater.blogspot.com/

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Diagonal one piece is what is  preferred and just do one piece. Then harness in two pieces

Pit Crew Revenge Racing   Rolling chicanelimo,95Lamdspeeder,Gimp Pimp Cadi,300zx Car show kaboom!! 90 Wagovan, mazda v8 Lemons LOGO TATTOO!  Aces 84 Cadi Eldo Briattz I O E WINNER
Class C win with LemonOdy Cannonball Run Whambulance !EX K Captain
Lemons Trophy Truck ShaGuar Baby!

106

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

My deal is I'm running out of time the race is in 2 weeks so I would have to cut out the bars in the back  out of the car and refab some new ones, If it will pass I need to weld the roof back on so I can finish the car, I'am thinking of adding some gussetts to help it out also.

2010, 26th @ CMP, 2011, 10th & 5th at CMP, 2012? (MIA), 2013 Spring CMP, 53rd, 2013 Fall CMP 44th, 2014 Barber 14th, 2014 CMP 46th, 2015 CMP 57th, 2015 CMP 80th, 2016 CMP 16th, 3rd in B class, Winner Judges choice, and First car under 2.0 liter Alex's lemon aide stand winner. 2017 WRL, Road Atlanta 43rd, 2017 NCM 9th O/A , 1st in B class, 2018 CMP 13th O/A 3rd in Class B

107 (edited by OMGuar 2010-11-06 07:07 AM)

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

Nick_LeMonsHQ wrote:

Due to confusion over the use of the word "continuous" in describing certain parts of the cage, we've updated the rules to say this:

Each major load-bearing member must be formed from its own single, continuous tube.

Basically, we're trying to avoid welded-together sections in major stress-bearing parts of the cage. ALL of the following designs are legal front-hoop configurations; welding the bolted sections (where applicable) is highly recommended:

NOTE: These illustrations serve to illustrate different styles of front hoops. Other elements of the cage designs shown may not conform to the Lemons rules. http://www.24hoursoflemons.com/pricesandrules.aspx

Single-piece front hoop:
http://www.hoverd.org/Tim/Fury/images/r … ign_01.gif

Left and Right bars:
http://speed-eng.com/store/images/Roll%20Cage.jpg

Halo loop:
http://www.therangerstation.com/tech_li … awing1.gif

Nick I don't read where Chrome Moly is allowed.   As you know Chrome Moly is much stronger but  slightly smaller in diameter and thickness.
  Would Chrome Moly be allowed?
Assuming good tig welds, bends, and design?

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

OMGuar wrote:

Nick I don't read where Chrome Moly is allowed.   As you know Chrome Moly is much stronger but  slightly smaller in diameter and thickness.
  Would Chrome Moly be allowed?
Assuming good tig welds, bends, and design?

Insurance requires a MINIMUM diamiter and thichness. You have to use those sizes. You have an option of material, but you must stay in that size.

Yee-Haw 2010 "Most Heroic Fix" & "I Got Screwed" -2 trophies for 1 lap, but I took checkered on my lap.
Gator-O-Rama 2012 "Organizers Choice" -2 laps 1 trophy, but i still finished ahead of an E30
Yee-Haw 2013 No trophy -26 laps, I think I see a pattern here
Gator-O-Rama 2014 "Waiting for the Last Minute Call from the Governor Award" -who's counting? John

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

TheHeckler wrote:
RobL wrote:

There is nothing to stop a crushing force on the main hoop (as in a rollover) since the rear stays would bend.

The engineer in me disagrees strongly here, there is plenty to prevent a serious crushing failure BUT...

Even with an extremely large load the x bars would prevent a complete folding of the cage structure.  Yes it is quite probable that there would be local bending near the top of the structure BUT unless the welds failed completely the cage would absorb MORE energy in bending than a 'Lemons legal' cage.  That said, you are relying on the quality of the welds to hold in shear on a serious vertical / diagonal impact at the top of the main hoop to prevent a failure and compression of the cage.

Designing a textbook rigid structure is easy.  That is the point of the rules, build a rigid structure out of solid materials known to be strong enough to prevent serious injury in typical collisions.

Engineering a structure to give in a controlled manner and minimize the loading on the occupants while providing safety in a very high energy impact is far more difficult and MUCH harder to verify.  This is why the rules are fairly strict for cages.  Yes, you can make the argument that a well engineered cage with intentional impact absorption zones is better but unless you have a certified engineer willing to sign his professional credentials against it you should build to the rules. 

I am always tempted to 'improve' on the rules but then I think like a liability lawyer / professional witness and decide to just build what is mandated to avoid the hassle.

The mandated structure is pretty damn good.  Use solid gear and a head/neck restraint and be done with it.

I too want to improve on the rules but if the cage does not extend out past the passenger compartment the front and rear of the car can still act as a crush zone.. The side impact is a concern but the only real solution is  to move the driver closer to the center of the car and find that NASCAR mandated foam between the door skin and the side impact bars..
  NASCAR found a really significant reduction in G loading on side impact with that stuff..
I haven't shopped for it yet but I'm afraid it's wicked expensive.. Might tempt me to use regular High density foam and simply wrap it in aluminum for fire protection..
Don't know how the club will react to that.. They sure got upset when I wanted to use some Chrome Moly I had.  (It's off by a tiny bit  something like .093  thick and 1.72 in diameter.  You'd swear they thought I wanted to steal their children the way they came after me)..

110

Re: Accepted front-hoop configurations for roll cages

The best way for clarification is to email nick directly at nick@24hoursoflemons.com 

I don't know how often he checks on these threads.

Racing 4 Nickels - 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera
2011 SHOWROOM-SCHLOCK SHOOTOUT  IOE Winner
2012 The Chubba Cheddar Enduro Class C winner
Facebook Page