Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

EricTheBrown wrote:

I had the kit that came with bearings sans the oil passages.  I have heard that on the cheap, you can flip thestock  bearings around so that there is no chance of the oil passages lining up.  Havn't actually done that myself, but that's something I would look into if Lemonizing a 4g63.

Flipping the bearings is completely fine. You're only using the bearings to block the oiling holes, so they don't need to be pristine. On the other hand, cutting the stock rear balance shaft is a bad idea. It has an oil passage running through it, so it's better to use the stub shaft that came in the 1.8l engines. Use the OEM stub shaft too, they're cheap and are superior to the aftermarket stub shafts.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

CarRacer wrote:
EricTheBrown wrote:

I had the kit that came with bearings sans the oil passages.  I have heard that on the cheap, you can flip thestock  bearings around so that there is no chance of the oil passages lining up.  Havn't actually done that myself, but that's something I would look into if Lemonizing a 4g63.

Flipping the bearings is completely fine. You're only using the bearings to block the oiling holes, so they don't need to be pristine. On the other hand, cutting the stock rear balance shaft is a bad idea. It has an oil passage running through it, so it's better to use the stub shaft that came in the 1.8l engines. Use the OEM stub shaft too, they're cheap and are superior to the aftermarket stub shafts.

I threaded and tapped the oil passage on mine. It worked, but true the actual part is cheap enough

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

That's even cheaper. If you have access, turning down the stock rear balance shaft in a lathe is what the AMS guys do for their "race shaft". Machine off the counter weight but still retain the bearing support of the block for high rpm operation.

Either way, this is probably all moot anyway as the car will run great after this much talk and the rest of the car will implode around it in a spectacular fashion.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

CarRacer wrote:

That's even cheaper. If you have access, turning down the stock rear balance shaft in a lathe is what the AMS guys do for their "race shaft". Machine off the counter weight but still retain the bearing support of the block for high rpm operation.

Either way, this is probably all moot anyway as the car will run great after this much talk and the rest of the car will implode around it in a spectacular fashion.

I was thinking the opposite, that something else will fail spectacularly in the engine and shoot flames out the bottom...

Silent But Deadly Racing-  Ricky Bobby's Laughing Clown Malt Liquor Thunderbird , Datsun 510, 87 Mustang (The Race Team Formerly Known as Prince), 72 Pinto Squire waggy, Parnelli Jones 67 Galaxie, Turbo Coupe Surf wagon.(The Surfin Bird), Squatting Dogs In Tracksuits,  Space Pants!  Roy Fuckin Kent and The tribute to a tribute to a tribute THUNDERBIRD/ SUNDAHBADOH!

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

It's a Mistu, so unless you're havin Pratt & Miller build you up a drivetrain made of Pure cheatonium, it'll die in some spectacular fashion SOMEWHERE on the track. Just remember, Mitsubishi just won the deConstructor's cup!

31 (edited by FJ40Jim 2011-01-14 08:06 AM)

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

A mitsu WON at the last NL race.

It was not built by P&M.

It was built by Buschur Racing.  (For those who don't know, they are mitsu demigods)
No cheatonium there roll .

Jim C.
If God meant for us to race, we'd all have baggy Nomex skin.
08TMS.09NL.10GM, SP, NL.11SP, NL.12SP, VIR, NL.13GM, NJ.14NJ, VIR, WGI.15AB.16GM.17NCM.18GM.19...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

See, now you guys are making me want to Lemonize my Talon.  It's pretty cheaty though - front mount inter-cooler, coil overs, 50 trim turbo, DSM Link, etc.  Maybe I'll take the laps, and just look at it as a challenge to finish the race.  Maybe even take a 4g63 & put it in something bulletproof, like a French, Italian  or British car.

I am mentally divergent in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life there. When I stop coming here, I will be well...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Check out the project zero G forums. They're all about putting 4G63 motors in RWD stuff. A guy makes custom bellhousing adapters for cheap that mate a bunch of different transmissions to the block. They don't use special clutches either. The Turbo 350 automatic trans would be a good choice for keeping the revs down and fitting in the budget.

Think of it now, a 4g powered Sprite, Sonnett, or something even cooler I don't know about.

34 (edited by rbankracing.com 2011-01-14 02:29 PM)

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Hello Jim,

Thanks for the advertising for one of our team members.  You certainly said it better than I ever could have! David Buschur and his guys at Buschur Racing, www.buschurracing.com , are probably the only people in the world that can get a DSM to finish a 24 hour race - Let alone a 24 hour race with this kind of budget.  Indeed he is a Demigod with DSM's and that is evidenced by their results in other forms of racing and now budget endurance road racing too.  With his help our team has been able to keep the Talonator chugging along which is the key to this whole thing.

You may recall that the Talonator had some serious reliability issues.  I purchased it from a chronically unemployed person who didn't know the meaning of the word service. This Talon was in seriously poor shape -- if it were in better shape or had a title I might have kept it as one of my street cars, like the other two that I currently own.  My family has had a long love affair with Talons -- my sister purchased a new 1990 Talon AWD TSi back in 1990, and then my Mom, Nephew, Sister in Law, and I each purchased one in short order.  We eventually sold my Mom's car to one of my best friends who drove it over 250,000 miles.  Even that car was in better shape than the Talonator.  The rest of my family has moved on to other vehicles, I am the only one stubborn enough to keep with them for 20 years now.  The Talonator didn't finish its first Lemons race at the Lamest Day in 2009.  Not surprisingly it blew the head gasket and took the head with it.  David offered to join the team and fix the car for us after seeing us win with a SAAB at CMP.  He wanted to see a DSM do well and showcase the fact that he could put a much maligned Mitsubishi/DSM together under this budget constraint and make it last in hopes of dispelling the notion that they only build drag race engines.  And, guess what, he did it!  He did rebuild the head which is in our budget and other than that used only his expertise like every other good Lemons team does.

The car is currently no where near the fastest.  It wasn't the fastest at the race it won and that was in a short field. In fact at both Lemons races it has been in it hasn't been anywhere near the top of the speed chart.  It was over 10 seconds a lap off the pace at PBIR.  Do you really think that is as fast as Buschur and I could make it run if the Lemons budget were not a factor? Really?

I think this great picture of the car from Ronman (Thanks Ronman) illustrates my point:

http://ronman.org/pics/Lemons/miami10/img_1233.htm


We will keep working hard to make it faster within the budget constraints presented.  I am hoping to be able to do some suspension work with the residual for the next race smile  But for now I am very proud of our accomplishments with the Talonator powered by Buschur Racing which has proven that it can go the distance -- 2 consecutive finishes in a 24-hour endurance marathon at Nelson Ledges (1st) and PBIR (11th).  My thanks go to Buschur Racing and their team of experts for proving that a Talon/Mitsubishi can go the distance. 

To the original poster, don't be afraid to run a Mitsu.  If you have any questions feel free to contact me and I will help in any way I can.  I have been told "There's a certain sense of camaraderie among "Plymouth" drivers." and I too have found that to be true, so best of luck.

Robin Bank
www.rbankracing.com

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Hmm. I can't get the image tag to work.  As I don't have that picture hosted anywhere and it is Ron's work and I want to give him all due credit you can just go to the URL to see the photo:

http://ronman.org/pics/Lemons/miami10/img_1233.htm

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Robin, wasn't the Lamest Day 2009 the only Lemons race that's been run at Nelson Ledges?  [asking because you mention blowing a head gasket at Lamest Day '09 but then say you got 1st at Nelson Ledges.. I hope I didn't miss a close by Lemons race!]

Quad4 CRX - Wartburg 311 - Civic Wagovan - Parnelli Jones Galaxie - LS400 - Lancia MR2 - Boat - Sentra - 56 Ford Victoria
Known Associate of 3pedal Mafia, Speedycop, and the Russians.  Maybe even NSF.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

It wasn't a Lemons race.  It was put on by another sanctioning body.  We won the race but the competition was not up to the usual Lemons level as the car count was somewhere in the teens.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

rbankracing.com wrote:

Hmm. I can't get the image tag to work.  As I don't have that picture hosted anywhere and it is Ron's work and I want to give him all due credit you can just go to the URL to see the photo:

http://ronman.org/pics/Lemons/miami10/img_1233.htm

You have to pull the image out of the HTML page.  right click, view image.  or right click, properties, pull the URL to the image from there.

http://ronman.org/pics/Lemons/miami10/img_1233_std.jpg

FastISH and the FURRiest 1991 Volvo 240 wagon
WV 13th, FL 8th (GRM), NJ 8th (B win), WV 4th (B win), NC 14th, NJ 14th, WV 62nd,  NH 17th, NY 54th
2012 Sears Point Outlaw...74th!

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Robin, the car looked fast to me, but I'm a whiny crybaby. smile

You and your drivers did an excellent job.  Unlike some other cars, I never saw the talonator spin off in a cloud of dirt.  I could blame your convincing win on excellent driving skills and fast pit stops.  But it makes me feel better to insinuate it was a cheaty car, and not our lame-o driving and 10 minute pitstops.

If only we had a turbo...
Or a 4G63 turbo powered Rabbit!

Jim C.
If God meant for us to race, we'd all have baggy Nomex skin.
08TMS.09NL.10GM, SP, NL.11SP, NL.12SP, VIR, NL.13GM, NJ.14NJ, VIR, WGI.15AB.16GM.17NCM.18GM.19...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Buscher racing is definitely DSM experts....a friend bought parts for his 1990 Eagle Talon TSI from David way back in the early 90's....that car ran 12's with bolt ons!!!!!

I also wonder why DSM's and Conquest don't do better in Lemons.....they can be very fast, but always have reliability issues.....

Richard Doty
1984 Porsche 928 "Estate"
Porsche- "there is A substitute" Racing
Dirt Poorsche Racing #2

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

you guys are making me want to revisit the 1990 Dodge Spirit ES my mom had... 3.0L mitsu V6 and 4-speed auto. pretty "spirited" car for the day.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Better than a Spirit w/ slushbox: Daytona w/ 3.0V6 and 5speed.  Not as furiously fast as a turboII car, but more reliable & easier to drive.

Jim C.
If God meant for us to race, we'd all have baggy Nomex skin.
08TMS.09NL.10GM, SP, NL.11SP, NL.12SP, VIR, NL.13GM, NJ.14NJ, VIR, WGI.15AB.16GM.17NCM.18GM.19...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Don't forget the Galant VRI (or whatever it was called)...basically an Eclispe AWD turbo platform with the 4 door body for "sleeper" value......  Kinda like how some Ford Escorts have Miata engines and end up being good Lemons racers

Your right about the V6 Spirit....my step mom had one...damm did that thing MOVE.....

Richard Doty
1984 Porsche 928 "Estate"
Porsche- "there is A substitute" Racing
Dirt Poorsche Racing #2

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

My mom had a 3.0 Plymouth Voyager. My parents are very conservative drivers, but it still threw a rod at 100,000 miles. Then it blew a head gasket or warped a head every 50,000 miles after until it hit 250,000 miles and my mom traded it in on a new Chrysler minivan.

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

EriktheAwful wrote:

It blew a head gasket or warped a head every 50,000 miles after until it hit 250,000 miles and my mom traded it in on a new Chrysler minivan.

As the Guinness guys say: Brilliant!!

Jim C.
If God meant for us to race, we'd all have baggy Nomex skin.
08TMS.09NL.10GM, SP, NL.11SP, NL.12SP, VIR, NL.13GM, NJ.14NJ, VIR, WGI.15AB.16GM.17NCM.18GM.19...

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

Well, she has nearly 250,000 miles on the newer van with no trouble except an A/C system that quit way back when it was under warranty.

47 (edited by Serj 2011-01-22 09:50 AM)

Re: Mitsubishi, Worst Idea?

yeah; my dad has a 1996 3.3L dodge grand caravan LE, w/like 220k on the ODO. the only significant trouble it's had that i recall is the speed sensor in the transmission died. basically everything was fine cept the tranny didn't know when it was supposed to shift so it stayed in default programming in 2nd gear. $200 at the stealership and good as new. He plans on taking it to 300k. had 2 previous vans as well; 89 3.0L mitsu(starting smoking around 110k) and the 90 was a 3.3L had the trans finally go around 190k.

If you told me I had to buy a used minivan right now for my family; I'd prolly get an 02-03 Grand Caravan 3.3L; but i'd never touch the mitsu powered ones. Somehow they have a way of screwing up motors that come out of the Dundee 'world engine group' plant.